Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 80%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds real semantic value: omitting query triggers type listing, and items match by game-printed plural as well as name. Limit, cursor, and include_inactive remain dependent on the schema, but the core query/types behavior is enriched.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.