Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 50%, with limit, cursor, and include_inactive left undocumented in the schema. The description does not compensate for these gaps; it only restates the general to/from concept already covered by the schema. It adds no meaning for the pagination, limit, or inactive-route parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.