list_lessons
List lessons (slug, title, track, order, summary), optionally filtered to one track.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| track | No | Optional track filter. |
List lessons (slug, title, track, order, summary), optionally filtered to one track.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| track | No | Optional track filter. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, description must disclose behavior. It mentions returned fields and optional filter but omits details like pagination, default ordering, or if all lessons are returned. Adequate but not fully transparent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, 15 words, front-loaded with key information. No wasted words; efficient and clear.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given simple tool (1 optional param, no output schema), description covers core purpose and parameters. Could mention result ordering or size limits but overall adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has one parameter (track) with enum and description. Description adds value by listing the exact fields returned, complementing the schema's minimal parameter description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it lists lessons with specific fields (slug, title, track, order, summary) and optional track filter. Distinguishes from sibling tools like get_lesson (single lesson) and complete_lesson (action).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Describes optional filtering but does not provide when-to-use versus alternatives like get_lesson or search. No explicit guidance on when not to use this tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: lesson management, session handling, admin operations, feedback, and overview. No two tools overlap in functionality.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., complete_lesson, start_session), but 'overview' is a plain noun, breaking the pattern. The rest are consistent.
9 tools is well-scoped for a course management system, covering all essential operations without bloat.
Covers lesson lifecycle, session management, admin actions, and feedback. Minor gap: no tool for editing lesson content, but not core to the server's purpose.