Skip to main content
Glama

Set Parking

set_parking

Enable or disable the parking page for a domain you own. When enabled, visitors to the domain see a default parking page (or a 'For Sale' page if a listing price is set). Parking is enabled by default for newly purchased domains. IMPORTANT: If the domain has existing DNS records, the response will include requires_confirmation=true and show the records that will be overwritten. You MUST inform the user and get their approval before calling again with confirm=true.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domainYesDomain to configure, e.g. example.com
confirmNoSet to true to confirm overwriting existing DNS records. Only needed when the first call returns requires_confirmation=true.
enabledYestrue to enable the parking page, false to disable it

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully discloses the most important behaviors: the effect on visitors, the default for new domains, the requires_confirmation response when DNS records exist, and the requirement to get user approval before setting confirm=true. This is critical for avoiding accidental overwrites.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, followed by concise explanations of behavior and the critical confirmation warning. Every sentence earns its place; no filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description adequately covers the confirmation response and overwrite risk, which is the most complex non-obvious behavior. However, since there is no output schema, it does not describe the success response shape or potential error conditions, leaving a small gap for an agent predicting outcomes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters, so baseline is 3. The description adds beyond the schema by explaining the approval workflow tied to the 'confirm' parameter and the visitor-facing impact of 'enabled'. This added value warrants a 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Enable or disable the parking page for a domain you own' with a specific verb and resource, and explains the effect (visitors see a parking page or For Sale page). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like set_dns or set_nameservers.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context including ownership prerequisite and the default state for new domains. The IMPORTANT note gives explicit guidance on the two-step confirmation flow for existing DNS records, but there are no explicit alternative comparisons (e.g., 'use set_dns instead') or exclusion conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

While most tools have distinct purposes, several clusters overlap significantly (e.g., check_email, check_email_deliverability, get_email_deliverability, get_domain_email_status; buy_domain, buy_aftermarket, acquire_domain). The descriptions are detailed and help differentiate, but the sheer number of tools makes it challenging for an agent to select the correct one without careful reading.

Naming Consistency3/5

The dominant pattern is verb_noun with underscores (e.g., create_mailbox, list_domains), but there are notable inconsistencies: destructive actions mix delete/remove/cancel/revoke/unsell, and a few names deviate entirely (search, dns_check, domain_status). The pattern is recognizable but not uniformly applied.

Tool Count1/5

With 122 tools, this vastly exceeds the 50+ threshold for extreme mismatch. Even for a comprehensive domain and email platform, the tool count is overwhelming and will likely hinder agent performance through excessive choice and context bloat.

Completeness4/5

The server covers a wide range of domains, DNS, email, marketplace, negotiations, transfers, webhooks, tokens, and billing. Minor gaps exist, such as no update operation for mail rules, no direct domain deletion, and limited mailbox configuration beyond forwarding and credentials, but most lifecycle workflows are supported.