Skip to main content
Glama

get_user_project_by_domain

Получить проект пользователя по домену.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "domain": "<domain>"
    },
    "name": "get_user_project_by_domain"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domainYesДомен проекта.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesИдентификатор проекта
domainYesДомен проекта
statusYesТекущий статус проекта
robot_typeYesБот, соблюдающий правила robots.txt во время краулер-аудита
week_reportYesВключён ли еженедельный отчёт по проекту
crawler_modeYesРежимы, используемые краулер-аудитом
date_createdYesДата и время создания проекта в формате ISO 8601
ga_connectedYesПодключён ли Google Analytics к проекту
gsc_connectedYesПодключён ли Google Search Engine к проекту
wordstat_typeYesТип сбора Wordstat
use_robots_txtYesСледовать ли правилам robots.txt
metrika_connectedYesПодключена ли Yandex.Metrika к проекту
crawler_user_linksYesСсылки, заданные пользователем для краулер-аудита
crawler_auto_updateYesВключено ли ежедневное обновление краулер-аудита страниц сайта
initialized_crawlerYesИнициализированы ли функции краулера, такие как crawler_auto_update, requests_per_second, use_robots_txt и robot_type
requests_per_secondYesМаксимально допустимое количество запросов в секунду при краулер-аудите
webmaster_connectedYesПодключён ли Yandex.Webmaster к проекту
advanced_auto_updateYesВключено ли ежедневное обновление анализа сайта
base_analytic_systemYesОсновная используемая система аналитики
initialized_advancedYesИнициализированы ли расширенные функции, такие как advanced_auto_update, week_report и base_analytic_system
initialized_keywordsYesДобавлены ли ключевые слова, указаны ли регионы и поисковые системы
crawler_restrict_rulesYesПравила ограничений для краулера
ignore_wordstat_regionYesИгнорировать ли регион поиска при сборе Wordstat
enabled_timeline_eventsYesОпределяет, какие события таймлайна запускают уведомления. Возможные значения: null (по умолчанию) — уведомления включены для всех событий. [] (пустой массив) — уведомления отключены для всех событий. ["ssl:exist", "sitemap:exist", ...] — уведомления включены только для перечисленных кодов событий.
allow_subdomains_in_serpYesУчитывать ли поддомены в результатах SERP
additional_timeline_events_emailsYesДополнительные email для уведомлений таймлайна

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

C2.4/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral-disclosure burden. It implies a read-only lookup with "Получить", but says nothing about permissions, behavior when the domain is not found, or whether multiple projects can match.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It is concise, though its brevity reflects under-specification rather than strong structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained here, and the single lookup parameter is documented. For a simple read tool this is minimally complete, but it lacks sibling disambiguation and error/not-found context important in a large toolset.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the single domain parameter is already documented in the schema. The description only says "by domain", which mirrors the schema without adding format, source, or validation details. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is essentially a verbatim restatement of the tool name: "get_user_project_by_domain" becomes "Get user's project by domain." It does identify the resource and lookup key, but it adds no distinguishing detail versus siblings such as get_user_project or get_user_projects.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool rather than get_user_project or get_user_projects. The only implied usage is the lookup by domain, which is already evident from the name and schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources