Skip to main content
Glama
This connector has been deprecated

Duplicate listing of the same server under an old namespace. The maintained listing is Layero (ru.layero/layero): same endpoint https://mcp.layero.ru/mcp, current description and tools. The landing-page generator described here was removed in MCP 2.0.

Data API базы: ключи

data_api_keys
Destructive

The database's Data API keys: list, issue, revoke.

The list never contains key values. Issuing and revoking need the
person's consent: a client with forms asks by itself; without forms ask
in the chat and pass confirmed=true. The value of an issued key is
returned once: the platform does not store secret keys. Hand it to the
person for their server and do not repeat it afterwards.

Revoking breaks everyone who uses the key — including the site, if the
key is baked into its build (`in_build`). Issuing and revoking need a
token with the admin scope.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
keyNoFor revoke: id or prefix of the key from the list.
kindNoFor issue: public — for the site (lives in the browser), secret — for a server only.public
labelNoFor issue: a label to recognise the key by in the list.
actionNo`list` — keys with prefixes, no values; `issue` — issue a key, its value is returned ONCE; `revoke` — revoke the key named in `key`.list
databaseNoThe database: name, slug or id. Without it — the organization's only database with the Data API enabled.
confirmedNotrue — the person has already agreed in the chat after seeing what will change. A client with forms does not need it: the server asks the person itself. Never set it without the person's explicit consent.
organizationNoOrganization slug. Without it — the only one, or the personal one.
expires_in_daysNoFor issue: lifetime in days; without it the key never expires.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
keysNo
actionYes
issuedNo
revokedNo
databaseYes
next_actionYes
organizationYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / action / description
      Previous value: -"`list` — ключи с префиксами, без значений; `issue` — выпустить ключ, значение вернётся ОДИН раз; `revoke` — отозвать ключ `key`."New value: +"`list` — keys with prefixes, no values; `issue` — issue a key, its value is returned ONCE; `revoke` — revoke the key named in `key`."
    • changedInput schema / properties / confirmed / description
      Previous value: -"true — человек уже согласился в чате, увидев, что поменяется. Клиенту с формами не нужен: он спросит сам. Без явного согласия человека не ставь."New value: +"true — the person has already agreed in the chat after seeing what will change. A client with forms does not need it: the server asks the person itself. Never set it without the person's explicit consent."
    • changedInput schema / properties / database / description
      Previous value: -"База: имя, слаг или id. Без него — единственная база организации с включённым Data API."New value: +"The database: name, slug or id. Without it — the organization's only database with the Data API enabled."
    • changedInput schema / properties / expires_in_days / description
      Previous value: -"Для issue: срок в днях; без него ключ бессрочный."New value: +"For issue: lifetime in days; without it the key never expires."
    • changedInput schema / properties / key / description
      Previous value: -"Для revoke: id или префикс ключа из списка."New value: +"For revoke: id or prefix of the key from the list."
    • changedInput schema / properties / kind / description
      Previous value: -"Для issue: public — для сайта (лежит в браузере), secret — только для сервера."New value: +"For issue: public — for the site (lives in the browser), secret — for a server only."
    • changedInput schema / properties / label / description
      Previous value: -"Для issue: подпись, по которой ключ узнают в списке."New value: +"For issue: a label to recognise the key by in the list."
    • changedInput schema / properties / organization / description
      Previous value: -"Организация (слаг). Без него — единственная или личная."New value: +"Organization slug. Without it — the only one, or the personal one."
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the destructiveHint annotation, the description thoroughly explains destructive and sensitive behaviors: list never exposes key values, issued keys are shown once and not stored, revoking breaks all users including in_build usage, and admin scope is required. This is exactly the behavioral detail an agent needs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the tool's actions, then adds only operationally critical details in a logical order: consent, secret handling, revocation impact, and auth. There is no filler or redundant restatement of schema fields.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a security-sensitive key-management tool, the description covers the essential operational, consent, and side-effect information an agent needs. Combined with the rich input schema and output schema, nothing important is missing for safe invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds genuine extra meaning beyond the schema by explaining the consent flow, the one-time return of secret values, and the in_build blast radius of revocation, which helps an agent reason about the confirmed, kind, and key parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb+resource combination: Data API keys can be listed, issued, and revoked. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like data_api_grant or data_api_methods without needing to inspect schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives concrete usage context: consent requirements, when to set confirmed=true, admin-scope needs, and the one-time secret handoff. It does not explicitly name alternative sibling tools or say when not to use this tool, but the action-oriented instructions are clear enough for an agent to act correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources