Skip to main content
Glama

particle_podcast_search_transcripts

Read-only

Search the podcast catalog by what is said in episodes — by meaning (semantic_search), by exact phrase (keyword_search), or both at once (hybrid ranking). This is THE way to retrieve relevant dialogue, segments, and clips: each result is one segment of one episode with bounded transcript windows pinpointing the highest-relevance lines, plus any highlight clips that overlap the segment inline on the match.

Segments partition an episode's transcript — where start_line and end_line are present, every spoken line belongs to exactly one segment and one segment's end_line + 1 is the next one's start_line. They are contiguous in transcript lines, not in wall-clock seconds: the seconds between one segment's end_seconds and the next's start_seconds contain no transcribed speech. These matches do not carry the line ranges themselves — fetch them with particle_podcast_get_episode and include: ["segments"], where their absence marks an episode segmented by an earlier version, a small share of which do leave lines uncovered. Clips are sparse, engagement-ranked highlights that overlap some segments. There is no separate clip-search tool — relevant clips arrive on these matches, and a known episode's full clip list is particle_podcast_get_episode with include: ["clips"].

A match window defaults to one line of context around each matched line; raise context to widen windows in place instead of fetching the full transcript.

Use this for "find dialogue about a topic". For "every line naming a person or company" use particle_podcast_find_mentions instead — person_slug and company_slug here narrow ranked results, they don't drive the ranking.

Choosing your query. At least one of semantic_search or keyword_search is required, and they do different jobs:

  • semantic_search carries the idea. Write it as a sentence describing what should be discussed, in the vocabulary a speaker would use. It is paraphrase-tolerant, so it finds the topic however it happens to be worded.

  • keyword_search carries words that must be literally spoken. Every word must occur in the same passage, so it is for one or two exact tokens — a ticker, a product name — not for a description. Putting a sentence here returns nothing.

  • Use both when a topic must also contain an exact term. The result is their intersection, which is narrow by design; if that comes back empty, keyword_match: "ranked" relaxes the keyword side to a relevance hint.

Do not put a name in semantic_search. Resolve it (particle_person_resolve, particle_company_resolve, particle_entity_resolve) and pass the slug — searching for "Sam Altman" as text finds passages that sound like him, while person_slug finds the episodes actually featuring him.

Start broad, then narrow. Every filter compounds, and each one can silently remove all results. Issue the query with semantic_search alone first, then add filters once you know the topic has coverage. If a search returns nothing because of your filters, the error names the specific parameter responsible and the retry to make — act on it rather than re-issuing variations of the same query.

Note on role. It describes how someone relates to the episode: guest/host/panelist/correspondent mean they spoke, mention means they were talked about. Omitting role covers both and is almost always what you want.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
roleNoHow the entity must relate to the episode. Speaking roles: 'guest', 'host', 'panelist', 'correspondent', or 'speaker' for any of them. 'mention' means the entity is talked about rather than speaking. Omit to match both — usually what you want.
sortNoSort order. Defaults to relevance.
limitNoResults per page (1-50, default 10).
sinceNoOnly segments from episodes published on or after this ISO 8601 date.
untilNoOnly segments from episodes published on or before this ISO 8601 date.
cursorNoOpaque pagination cursor from a previous response.
contextNoLines of surrounding dialogue around each matched line (1-15, default 1). Widens each match window in place — use a larger value instead of fetching the full transcript when a match needs more context.
languageNoRestrict to episodes of podcasts in this language — ISO 639-1 code (e.g. 'fr'). Matches the podcast's primary language subtag, so 'fr' covers 'fr-FR'.
entity_slugNoKnowledge-graph entity slug from particle_entity_resolve for the long tail that isn't a person or company — places, organizations, events, products, concepts (e.g. 'germany'). Use person_slug for people and company_slug for companies.
entity_typeNoNarrow to dialogue in episodes that mention any entity of this category — e.g. 'book', 'company', 'movie', 'school'. Use for 'discussions of X that reference some book'. Ignored when person_slug/company_slug/entity_slug names a specific entity, which is strictly narrower. Categories come from particle_catalog.
person_slugNoPerson slug or encoded person ID from particle_person_resolve, particle_entity_resolve, or the guest tools (e.g. 'sam-altman'). Filters results to dialogue featuring this person. For 'every line about X' use particle_podcast_find_mentions instead.
company_slugNoCompany slug, domain, or ID. Resolves to the company's linked entity and applies as a filter.
episode_slugNoFilter to a specific episode by slug or ID.
podcast_slugNoPodcast slug, internal ID, or numeric iTunes ID.
segment_typeNoSegment type filter.
keyword_matchNoHow UNQUOTED keyword_search words are applied. 'required' (default) excludes any passage missing one of them, which also makes a hybrid call an intersection with semantic_search. Switch to 'ranked' when keyword_search is a loose bag of related words that will not co-occur — then those words only steer relevance. Quoted phrases still filter in both modes: to relax a phrase, remove its quotes rather than switching mode.
output_formatNoOutput serialization. 'markdown' (default) returns the LLM-facing rendering. 'json' returns the structured payload as JSON text — use only for programmatic chaining where exact field extraction matters; the JSON shape is larger and noisier for an LLM to read.
keyword_searchNoWords that must literally be spoken. Use for exact tokens a paraphrase would miss — tickers, product names, drug names, model numbers. Every word must appear in the same passage (see keyword_match), so keep it to the one or two words that must be said and put the rest of the idea in semantic_search. Wrap words in double quotes to also require them adjacent and in order in the segment's spoken dialogue — only for short exact strings, never for a sentence. A quoted name matches segments where the name appears in the dialogue, not segments that person speaks in; use person_slug or particle_podcast_find_mentions for a person's appearances. There is no boolean OR: 'a OR b' requires the literal word 'OR', so issue one call per alternative.
semantic_searchNoVector-similarity search by meaning. Express the query the way you'd describe the topic to a colleague — paraphrase tolerant. Combine with keyword_search for hybrid ranking. Describe a topic, not a name: to find a specific person/company/entity, filter with person_slug / company_slug / entity_slug (or use particle_podcast_find_mentions for every line about them) — and for an exact token like a ticker, use keyword_search.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare readOnlyHint=true, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It delivers substantial detail: segment contiguity and partition semantics, match-window context defaults, how `keyword_match: "ranked"` relaxes the keyword side, how `role` distinguishes speaking vs mentioned entities, the difference between `output_format` modes, and even error behavior ('the error names the specific parameter responsible'). No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is long but well-structured: it front-loads the core purpose, uses bolded section headers ('Choosing your query', 'Start broad', 'Note on role'), and organizes parameter guidance coherently. There is minor redundancy with the schema (e.g., `context` and `output_format` described in both places), but no wasted filler; the length is justified by the tool's complexity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 19 parameters and no output schema, the description is unusually complete. It covers the shape of results (segments + clips), how segments map to transcript lines, how to get full segment line ranges via `particle_podcast_get_episode`, the closed interplay between search modes, filter compounding risks, pagination behavior is left to schema but search strategy is fully explained. An agent has enough context to call this tool correctly in most scenarios.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3, but the description significantly enriches parameter meaning. It explains that `semantic_search` carries the idea while `keyword_search` requires literally spoken words, warns against putting names in `semantic_search`, clarifies quoted phrases, and explains `keyword_match`, `role`, `context`, and `output_format` in ways the schema does not. This materially improves correct parameter usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Search the podcast catalog by what is said in episodes,' and clearly defines the three search modes and the unit of output ('one segment of one episode with bounded transcript windows... plus any highlight clips'). It also names the sibling alternative `particle_podcast_find_mentions`, so an agent can distinguish this tool from related ones without reading schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage guidance is explicit and actionable: 'Use this for "find dialogue *about* a topic". For "every line *naming* a person or company" use `particle_podcast_find_mentions` instead.' It also routes segment/clip retrieval to `particle_podcast_get_episode`, states 'There is no separate clip-search tool,' and gives a clear query workflow ('Start broad, then narrow'). This goes well beyond implied usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources