Skip to main content
Glama

twocents

Get reviewer feedback for a shared page

get_feedback

Fetch the reviewer notes for a page shared with share_page, as markdown grouped by page. Each note carries the anchored text, the element and its markup as the reviewer saw it, so you can locate and apply it; each page heading carries a URL to read the whole page back, so you never have to guess which file it is. Show your human each new note and apply only the ones they approve. Pass the note ids already decided in earlier sessions as "handled" to see only what is new.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
roomYesThe room id returned by share_page.
handledNoNote ids the creator already decided on (applied or skipped) — e.g. the keys of a saved .twocents/decisions.json. These are summarized in one line each instead of repeated in full, so the response leads with what still needs a decision.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / handled
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Note ids the creator already decided on (applied or skipped) — e.g. the keys of a saved .twocents/decisions.json. These are summarized in one line each instead of repeated in full, so the response leads with what still needs a decision.",
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full disclosure burden and meets it exceptionally: it details what the output contains (anchored text, element, markup, URL per heading), how it is structured, and the intended interactive workflow. It goes far beyond a simple 'fetch' and prepares the agent for real usage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each dense with purpose: the first states the core function and format, the second details the note contents and page URLs, and the third gives operational guidance. No filler, perfectly front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, the description clearly explains the return format (markdown grouped by page, note details, URLs). It covers both parameters contextually and provides a complete workflow for an agent, leaving little ambiguity for a tool with this moderate complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents 'room' and 'handled'. The description adds meaningful context for 'handled' by explaining it represents previously decided note ids and that such notes appear summarized rather than in full, which goes beyond the schema's field description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb ('Fetch') and resource ('reviewer notes for a page shared with share_page'), and adds useful detail (markdown, grouped by page). It clearly distinguishes from the sibling share_page by focusing on retrieval rather than creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly ties usage to pages shared via share_page, explains the workflow (show human, apply only approved notes), and instructs how to use the 'handled' parameter to filter previously decided notes. This gives clear when and how, even without naming alternatives beyond the sibling.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.