Skip to main content
Glama

Get Transaction Status

get_tx_status
Read-onlyIdempotent

Returns THORNode's raw status for an inbound transaction: every processing stage, planned outbounds and sent outbounds. For a plain answer (pending, streaming, sent, refunded) use get_swap_status; use this for stage-level detail.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "hash": "<hash>"
    },
    "name": "get_tx_status"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
hashYesThe inbound transaction hash to check status for

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds real value by disclosing the response shape (per-stage data plus planned and sent outbounds), which is otherwise unavailable since there is no output schema. It stops short of noting behavior for an unknown or not-yet-indexed hash.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero filler, with the primary capability front-loaded and the disambiguation trailing. Every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read tool with full annotation coverage, the definition supplies purpose, alternative routing, and a sketch of the return contents. Minor gap: no note on what happens when the hash is unknown or the transaction is unindexed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single 'hash' parameter is documented as the inbound transaction hash, so the schema carries the burden. The description adds the qualifier 'inbound', but no format or validation details beyond that.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Returns THORNode's raw status for an inbound transaction') and enumerates what the payload contains: processing stages, planned outbounds, sent outbounds. The sibling contrast with get_swap_status makes the boundary unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent: use get_swap_status for a plain answer (pending/streaming/sent/refunded), use this for stage-level detail. Both the when and the alternative are named directly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources