Skip to main content
Glama

DeFade — Multi-Chain Memecoin Analyzer

Shared fee-setting fingerprint

get_fee_fingerprint
Read-onlyIdempotent

Wallets whose transactions pin an identical compute-unit price or Jito tip — one operator's bot settings showing up across every wallet it drives. This is the shared-CONFIGURATION member of the "who is really behind this token" family (proven transfers: get_wallet_links; funding origin: get_funding_sources; behavioural twins: get_lookalike_clusters), not a timing link: it never proves bundling, and two wallets can match days apart. Use it to corroborate get_lookalike_clusters, and to catch the operator who sold their launch wallets and re-entered through fresh ones; read a match as corroboration, never as proof of coordinated buying. Groups are strongest first; pending true means no bundle scan has run for this token yet, so nothing has looked rather than nothing was found. Arguments: address, and chain only as solana (or omitted) — the fee settings it reads exist only on Solana, so any other chain is refused before a request is spent. One API unit.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
chainNoOnly solana: this tool has no implementation on other chains, and any other value is refused before a request is spent. Omit it for solana.solana
addressYesThe token's own contract address, exactly as an explorer shows it. Solana: the base58 mint, 32-44 characters (e.g. 6p6xgHyF7AeE6TZkSmFsko444wqoP15icUSqi2jfGiPN). EVM: 0x followed by 40 hex characters, case-insensitive (e.g. 0x6982508145454ce325ddbe47a25d4ec3d2311933). Never a pool, pair, wallet or deployer address — those come back as not found. Set `chain` to match the address: a 0x address alone cannot say which EVM chain it lives on, and a Solana mint sent with an EVM chain is rejected.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
statsNoWallets seen, how many carried a readable fee setting, how many were linked, how many set none.
tokenNoThe address that was scanned (on get_token_scan, the full token metadata object instead).
groupsNoOne entry per fee setting shared by two or more wallets, strongest first: wallets, supplyPct bought, confidence.
pendingNoTrue when no bundle scan has run for this token yet: nothing has looked, not nothing was found.
excludedNoFee values suppressed as client defaults, with the wallet count each covered.
poweredByNoAlways "DeFade.org".
timestampNoISO time the response was assembled.
computedAtNoWhen this result was read.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / chain / description
      Previous value: -"Chain the token is deployed on: solana (default), ethereum, base, robinhood. Required for any 0x address, because the same contract address can exist on several EVM chains. Omit it for Solana. An unsupported value is rejected before any request is spent; EVM chains need a key on an All-Chains plan."New value: +"Only solana: this tool has no implementation on other chains, and any other value is refused before a request is spent. Omit it for solana."
    • changedInput schema / properties / chain / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "solana",
      -  "ethereum",
      -  "base",
      -  "robinhood"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "solana"
      +]
  2. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / computedAt / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / excluded / type
      Previous value: -"array"New value: +[
      +  "array",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / groups / type
      Previous value: -"array"New value: +[
      +  "array",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / pending / type
      Previous value: -"boolean"New value: +[
      +  "boolean",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / poweredBy / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / stats / type
      Previous value: -"object"New value: +[
      +  "object",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / timestamp / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "computedAt": {
      +      "description": "When this result was read.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "excluded": {
      +      "description": "Fee values suppressed as client defaults, with the wallet count each covered.",
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "groups": {
      +      "description": "One entry per fee setting shared by two or more wallets, strongest first: wallets, supplyPct bought, confidence.",
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "pending": {
      +      "description": "True when no bundle scan has run for this token yet: nothing has looked, not nothing was found.",
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "poweredBy": {
      +      "description": "Always \"DeFade.org\".",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "stats": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "description": "Wallets seen, how many carried a readable fee setting, how many were linked, how many set none.",
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "timestamp": {
      +      "description": "ISO time the response was assembled.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "token": {
      +      "description": "The address that was scanned (on get_token_scan, the full token metadata object instead)."
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / address / description
      Previous value: -"Token contract address. A base58 mint for Solana, or 0x-prefixed for EVM chains. Set `chain` to match — a 0x address alone cannot say which EVM chain it lives on."New value: +"The token's own contract address, exactly as an explorer shows it. Solana: the base58 mint, 32-44 characters (e.g. 6p6xgHyF7AeE6TZkSmFsko444wqoP15icUSqi2jfGiPN). EVM: 0x followed by 40 hex characters, case-insensitive (e.g. 0x6982508145454ce325ddbe47a25d4ec3d2311933). Never a pool, pair, wallet or deployer address — those come back as not found. Set `chain` to match the address: a 0x address alone cannot say which EVM chain it lives on, and a Solana mint sent with an EVM chain is rejected."
    • changedInput schema / properties / chain / description
      Previous value: -"Which chain the address lives on. Defaults to solana."New value: +"Chain the token is deployed on: solana (default), ethereum, base, robinhood. Required for any 0x address, because the same contract address can exist on several EVM chains. Omit it for Solana. An unsupported value is rejected before any request is spent; EVM chains need a key on an All-Chains plan."
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description fully aligns with readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false. It also discloses that non-Solana chains are refused before spending a request and that certain address types come back as not found, making side effects and error behavior transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but occasionally redundant — e.g., 'never proves bundling' and 'never as proof of coordinated buying' convey the same point. Still, each section (purpose, family, usage, output ordering, arguments) earns its place, so only minor trimming is needed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the description does not need to explain return structure, yet it still adds practical details like 'Groups are strongest first' and the meaning of 'pending true.' It also covers rejection and not-found cases, making it fully complete for an agent to decide and call.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already covers 100% of parameters, and the description enriches both address and chain semantics — explaining address formats, what is not accepted, the need to match chain to address, and that EVM with a Solana mint is rejected. This is valuable beyond the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool returns wallets sharing identical fee settings (compute-unit price or Jito tip), and explicitly distinguishes it from siblings like get_wallet_links, get_funding_sources, and get_lookalike_clusters, while clarifying it is not a timing link. The purpose is unambiguous and differentiates well.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use it (corroborate get_lookalike_clusters, catch operators who sold and re-entered with fresh wallets) and when not to (never proves bundling, never proof of coordinated buying). This actionable guidance goes beyond the schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources