Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 57% schema coverage, the description compensates for the weakest spots: it explains that benchmark requires an explicit priced benchmarkTicker because a benchmark name cannot resolve to a price series, and it clarifies series availability semantics. It says nothing about how limit interacts with interval aggregation or about startDate/endDate beyond their pattern, leaving gaps.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.