FREE teaser: headline totals of the Algorand x402 challenge economy. The full market pulse (top merchants/payers, velocity, concentration) is the paid /commission/pulse product ($0.01).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It clearly signals that the tool is free and returns only headline totals, not the full market pulse. It does not mention authentication or rate limits, but for a zero-parameter read-only teaser with an output schema, the disclosed scope and pricing behavior are sufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences with no filler. It front-loads the key fact 'FREE teaser' and immediately defines the tool's output scope, then clarifies the paid alternative. Every clause earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter, free teaser tool with an output schema, the description is largely complete: it states the domain, the included data, and the paid upgrade path. It could name the specific output fields, but the presence of an output schema means that detail is not required in the description.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so there are no parameter semantics to explain. The description correctly focuses on what the tool returns rather than inputs. A baseline of 4 is appropriate since there is nothing missing for parameter understanding.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly identifies the tool as a free teaser that returns headline totals of the Algorand x402 challenge economy, and contrasts it with the paid full market pulse product. It lacks an explicit verb like 'get' or 'fetch,' but the resource and scope are specific enough for an agent to understand its function.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description states that this is the free teaser option and that the fuller market pulse data is the paid /commission/pulse product. This gives agents a clear decision rule: use this tool for headline totals, and go to the paid product if comprehensive metrics are needed. It does not name a sibling tool explicitly, but the paid product boundary serves as a useful exclusion.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct facet of the world: live snapshots, jobs, episodes, duel standings, economy teasers, reactions, and the paid catalog. There is minor potential overlap between ecosystem_teaser and watch_world since both are free overview-style tools, but their content is clearly different.
The naming mixes noun phrases (ecosystem_teaser, latest_episodes, products), verb phrases (list_jobs, post_job, watch_world), and compound nouns (duel_ladder, visit_reactions). All names use snake_case, but there is no consistent verb_noun or noun pattern across the set.
Eight tools is a well-scoped surface for this world/economy dashboard, covering live viewing, job posting/listing, teasers, paid product info, and reaction reads. Each tool earns its place without bloat or thinness.
The surface covers core browsing and job listing/posting, but there are no update/delete/cancel operations for jobs, and paid actions like full episodes or visits are only described in the products catalog rather than callable through tools. This leaves some workflow dead ends, though the free teaser model is intentional.