Previous value: -"payers, linked, viaParties, largestGroup: payers of this address that share an OBSCURE third party with another of its payers. This is the test of `dealings.independent`, which counts payers that never paid it back and has never been proof they are different parties. A party paid by two to ten addresses in all counts; a hub paid by more does not, because two agents both paying a hub have shown only that the hub is popular. EVIDENCE OF A LINK, NEVER PROOF OF ONE OPERATOR — two payers paying one small service are two customers of that service. `groups` names which payers and through what and needs the `independence.test` capability; where it is withheld, `capability` says so. A linked count of zero is not proof they are unrelated: one owner funding addresses that never touch each other again leaves nothing for this to find."New value: +"payers, linked, viaParties, largestGroup: payers of this address that share an OBSCURE third party with another of its payers. This is the test of `dealings.independent`, which counts payers that never paid it back and has never been proof they are different parties. A party paid by two to ten addresses in all counts; a hub paid by more does not, because two agents both paying a hub have shown only that the hub is popular. EVIDENCE OF A LINK, NEVER PROOF OF ONE OPERATOR — two payers paying one small service are two customers of that service. `groups` names which payers and through what and needs the `independence.test` capability; where it is withheld, `capability` says so. A linked count of zero is not proof they are unrelated: one owner funding addresses that never touch each other again leaves nothing for this to find. `differentPopulation` IS PRESENT WHEN THIS BLOCK AND THE RECORD ABOVE IT COUNT DIFFERENT NUMBERS OF PAYERS, which happens because they are two jobs on two schedules: it carries `why: \"different_population_snapshots\"`, both counts and both dates. Neither figure is wrong, and the linkage here describes the population in THIS block, not the larger one. It is null when they agree, so its presence means something."

Added value: +{
+  "description": "payers, linked, viaParties, largestGroup: payers of this address that share an OBSCURE third party with another of its payers. This is the test of `dealings.independent`, which counts payers that never paid it back and has never been proof they are different parties. A party paid by two to ten addresses in all counts; a hub paid by more does not, because two agents both paying a hub have shown only that the hub is popular. EVIDENCE OF A LINK, NEVER PROOF OF ONE OPERATOR — two payers paying one small service are two customers of that service. `groups` names which payers and through what and needs the `independence.test` capability; where it is withheld, `capability` says so. A linked count of zero is not proof they are unrelated: one owner funding addresses that never touch each other again leaves nothing for this to find.",
+  "type": [
+    "object",
+    "null"
+  ]
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "suppliers, payments, spentUsd, largestShare and recent.{suppliers90,largestShare90}: every party this address has PAID. NOT the mirror of `dealings` — a dealing is a sale and needs a seller on the other end, while a payment out counts whoever receives it, so a recipient here may be a relayer, a settlement route or a customer being paid back. `largestShare` is null below three suppliers, where it could only be a half or a whole. Zero suppliers means it has paid nobody on a rail we read, never that it depends on nobody: a model, an endpoint, a host and a key are dependencies no payment rail shows.",
+  "type": [
+    "object",
+    "null"
+  ]
+}

Added value: +"The address as we read it, normalised. Compare it with what you sent before acting on the answer."

Added value: +"Escrows on the Masumi rail. Null where we hold no reading for this address at all, which is not the same as zero escrows."

Added value: +"Deliveries on the Olas mech marketplace, and what was paid for them where we hold it. A rail many agents never touch; zero here is not a mark against an address."

Added value: +"Sales and payers on the x402 rail. Payers are counted as parties, not payments: one buyer paying fifty times is one payer."

Previous value: -"How its ACP jobs ended, where it has any."New value: +"How its jobs ended, where it has any."

Previous value: -[
-  "object",
-  "null"
-]New value: +"object"

Added value: +{
+  "description": "The same address on the capital side — a vault or an operator — with the check to call. A match on the address, never an identification of the party.",
+  "type": [
+    "object",
+    "null"
+  ]
+}

Added value: +"rails, chains, counterparties, independent, largestShare, firstPaid, lastPaid. `independent` means no payment BACK on the rails we read — NOT proof the payers are different parties, since one owner can fund many addresses."

Previous value: -"integer"New value: +"object"

Added value: +{
+  "description": "What kind of address this is and what we read for it.",
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Registrations it holds. Claims, never verification.",
+  "type": "object"
+}

Removed value: -{
-  "description": "Counterparties that paid it and were never paid back. NOT proof they are different parties: one owner can fund many addresses.",
-  "type": "integer"
-}

Removed value: -{
-  "description": "How concentrated its custom is, 0 to 1.",
-  "type": [
-    "number",
-    "null"
-  ]
-}

Removed value: -{
-  "description": "An all-time record says nothing about whether the agent still works.",
-  "format": "date-time",
-  "type": [
-    "string",
-    "null"
-  ]
-}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "What this answer cannot tell you. Quote it with the numbers.",
+  "type": "string"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "type": [
+    "object",
+    "null"
+  ]
+}

Added value: +{
+  "type": "object"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "The findings, each with its evidence class and its own words. Read these first.",
+  "items": {
+    "type": "object"
+  },
+  "type": "array"
+}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "What it was paid for, in the subject’s own words.",
+  "type": [
+    "object",
+    "null"
+  ]
+}

Removed value: -{
-  "type": "string"
-}

Added value: +{
+  "description": "Callable services it declares, and how many answered our probe.",
+  "type": "object"
+}

Removed value: -{
-  "description": "Whether its advertised service answered our probe. Null where it advertises none.",
-  "type": [
-    "boolean",
-    "null"
-  ]
-}

Added value: +{
+  "type": "object"
+}

Previous value: -[
-  "address",
-  "says"
-]New value: +[
+  "address",
+  "format",
+  "observations",
+  "limits"
+]

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "properties": {
+    "acp": {
+      "description": "How its ACP jobs ended, where it has any.",
+      "type": [
+        "object",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "address": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "dealings": {
+      "type": "integer"
+    },
+    "independent": {
+      "description": "Counterparties that paid it and were never paid back. NOT proof they are different parties: one owner can fund many addresses.",
+      "type": "integer"
+    },
+    "largestShare": {
+      "description": "How concentrated its custom is, 0 to 1.",
+      "type": [
+        "number",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "lastPaid": {
+      "description": "An all-time record says nothing about whether the agent still works.",
+      "format": "date-time",
+      "type": [
+        "string",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    },
+    "says": {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "serving": {
+      "description": "Whether its advertised service answered our probe. Null where it advertises none.",
+      "type": [
+        "boolean",
+        "null"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "address",
+    "says"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}