xrplme_list_countries
List the 30 countries. FREE.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List the 30 countries. FREE.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It states the tool lists 30 countries and is free, but doesn't explain the return format, whether it's paginated, or what 'free' entails in context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
It's extremely concise at just 4 words, front-loading the core purpose. Every word earns its place, though it could be slightly more informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the sibling tools and lack of output schema, this description is minimal. It doesn't clarify what data is returned about each country or how it relates to other country-related tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters (0 count), so baseline 4 is appropriate. No parameter semantics needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
It has a clear verb and resource ('List the 30 countries'), so the agent knows exactly what the tool returns. However, it doesn't differentiate itself from siblings like xrplme_get_country_data or xrplme_get_country_schema.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this versus siblings. 'FREE' hints at pricing considerations but doesn't explicitly state alternatives or conditions for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.