Skip to main content
Glama

SaSame MCP Observatory + Gold Rush Town

by online.sasame

escrow_attest

Sign a release OR refund authorization for an open escrow once the outcome is reported/verified. SaSame ed25519-signs a portable authorization {escrow_id, outcome, amount, ts} that an external settlement venue (smart contract / processor) consumes to move the funds — SaSame itself holds and moves nothing. Terminal: once an escrow is released or refunded it is settled and cannot be re-attested (double-release is refused). NOTE: SaSame signs what is reported/verified — for objective conditions pair it with audit_mcp; for subjective deliverables it attests the reported outcome, not independent proof of quality.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
memoNoOptional note
outcomeYesrelease = pay the payee; refund = return to the payer
evidenceNoWhat the verdict is based on, e.g. 'audit_mcp grade A' or 'payer confirmed acceptance'
escrow_idYesThe escrow_id from escrow_open

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide no behavioral cues; the description compensates fully by detailing that SaSame signs a portable authorization, holds/moves nothing, and that the tool is terminal (double-release refused). No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is efficient (5 sentences) and front-loaded with main verb and resource. Minor redundancy ('SaSame' repeated, 'once the outcome is reported/verified' implied elsewhere) could be tightened, but no extraneous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 4 parameters, no output schema, and minimal annotations, the description covers purpose, outcome options, evidence guidance, and terminality. It mentions the signed data structure but lacks explicit return format. Could briefly describe the output for full completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions. The description adds value by explaining that escrow_id comes from escrow_open and gives examples for evidence, though it introduces 'amount' and 'ts' not in input schema, causing slight confusion. Overall well-supported.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Sign' and the resource 'release OR refund authorization for an open escrow', distinguishing it from sibling tools like escrow_open and escrow_status by specifying it operates on open escrows after outcome verification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use (after outcome reported/verified), notes terminal behavior (cannot re-attest after settlement), and provides alternative guidance for objective vs subjective conditions by referencing audit_mcp.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All SaSame MCP Observatory + Gold Rush Town toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

With 94 tools spanning overlapping concepts (multiple readiness/audit/grade tools, many status checkers, deprecated aliases like trust_* vs observation_*), agents will frequently struggle to pick the right one. While each tool is individually distinct, the sheer volume and conceptual overlap (e.g., audit_mcp, readiness_report, verify_mcp_ready, lookup_readiness, recommend_mcp, subscribe_grade_changes) create high misselection risk.

Naming Consistency3/5

Most tools use snake_case with underscores, but the pattern is inconsistent: some are verb-first (audit_mcp, verify_mcp_ready, claim_start, check_engagement) while others are noun-first (receipt_issue, meter_open, work_order_open, agent_invoice_status). Deprecated aliases like trust_compare vs observation_compare further break consistency, though the majority remain readable.

Tool Count1/5

94 tools is far beyond any reasonable scope for a single server, even one with broad ambitions like 'observatory + town'. The calibration notes 50+ as extreme mismatch; this server far exceeds that. Many tools are highly specific (e.g., factory_resolve_dead_letter, visit_touch_status, start_here) and could be consolidated or split into separate servers.

Completeness3/5

The server covers a wide range of domains (auditing, claiming, receipts, meters, escrow, work orders, gold rush, town, analytics) and offers many CRUD-like operations, but several lifecycle gaps exist: no cancel/close for work orders (only open/accept/deliver/accept_delivery), escrow (only open/attest/status), or meters (only open/charge/status). Given the massive scope, important operations are missing, though core workflows are present.

Resources