Skip to main content
Glama

Account setup progress

patroltech_account_get_onboarding
Read-onlyIdempotent

Use when you want to know what is missing to get the account running and what the next step is. Returns the setup checklist (checkpoints, guards, guards with a scan, scans, routes) and nextStep, the recommended next step. Do not use when you need a detailed list; the specific tools give it.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "patroltech_account_get_onboarding"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
organizationNoOmit unless the account has more than one organization; then the exact name (or id) as listed by patroltech_account_get_context.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish that this is read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world. The description adds useful behavioral context by disclosing the returned checklist categories and `nextStep`, which is valuable because there is no output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three tight sentences: usage condition first, then return contents, then exclusion. There is little redundancy and no irrelevant material.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple, read-only summary tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description gives enough context to call it correctly and understand its return shape. It could be fuller about the exact checklist structure, but the core behavior is covered.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is only one optional `organization` parameter, and the schema documents it completely, including when to omit it. The description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond the schema, so the high schema coverage baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the concrete outcome: it returns the setup checklist and `nextStep`, the recommended next step, for getting an account running. It also distinguishes this summary view from more detailed list tools, so an agent can tell what it is for without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a clear use case ('know what is missing') and an explicit exclusion ('Do not use when you need a detailed list'). The alternative is only described generically as 'the specific tools', rather than naming the sibling tools, so it falls short of full routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.