Skip to main content
Glama

AIsa SEO & AI Visibility

Live Google Local Finder SERP

post_dataforseo_serp_google_local_finder_live
Destructive

Live Google Local_finder SERP provides real-time search engine results for the specified keyword and location. By default, you can get up to 20 results for desktop and up to 10 results for mobile.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / body / items / properties / keyword / description
      Previous value: -"Keyword to search for"New value: +"keyword required field you can specify up to 700 characters in the keyword field all %## will be decoded (plus character ‘+’ will be decoded to a space character) if you need to use the “%” character for your keyword, please specify it as “%25”; if you need to use the “+” character for your keyword, please specify it as “%2B” learn more about rules and limitations of keyword and keywords fields in DataForSEO APIs in this Help Center article"
    • changedInput schema / properties / body / items / properties / language_code / description
      Previous value: -"Search engine language code"New value: +"search engine language code required field if you don't specify language_name if you use this field, you don't need to specify language_name you can receive the list of available languages of the search engine with their language_code by making a separate request to the https://api.dataforseo.com/v3/serp/{{low_se_name}}/languages example:en"
    • changedInput schema / properties / body / items / properties / language_name / description
      Previous value: -"Full name of search engine language"New value: +"full name of search engine language required field if you don't specify language_code if you use this field, you don't need to specify language_code you can receive the list of available languages of the search engine with their language_name by making a separate request to the https://api.dataforseo.com/v3/serp/{{low_se_name}}/languages example: English"
    • changedInput schema / properties / body / items / properties / location_code / description
      Previous value: -"Search engine location code"New value: +"search engine location code required field if you don't specify location_name or location_coordinate if you use this field, you don't need to specify location_name or location_coordinate you can receive the list of available locations of the search engines with their location_code by making a separate request to the https://api.dataforseo.com/v3/serp/{{low_se_name}}/locations example: 2840"
    • changedInput schema / properties / body / items / properties / location_coordinate / description
      Previous value: -"GPS coordinates of a location"New value: +"GPS coordinates of a location required field if you don't specify location_name or location_code if you use this field, you don't need to specify location_name or location_code location_coordinate parameter should be specified in the \"latitude,longitude,zoom\" format if \"zoom\" is not specified, 9z will be applied as a default value the maximum number of decimal digits for \"latitude\" and \"longitude\": 7 the minimum value for \"zoom\": 4z the maximum value for \"zoom\": 18z example: 52.6178549,-155.352142,20z"
    • changedInput schema / properties / body / items / properties / location_name / description
      Previous value: -"Full name of search engine location"New value: +"full name of search engine location required field if you don't specify location_code or location_coordinate if you use this field, you don't need to specify location_code or location_coordinate you can receive the list of available locations of the search engine with their location_name by making a separate request to the https://api.dataforseo.com/v3/serp/{{low_se_name}}/locations example: London,England,United Kingdom"
    • changedInput schema / properties / body / items / properties / min_rating / description
      Previous value: -"Minimum rating filter"New value: +"filter results by minimum rating optional field possible values for desktop: 3.5, 4, 4.5; possible values for mobile: 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5"
    • changedInput schema / properties / body / items / properties / time_filter / description
      Previous value: -"Time filter"New value: +"filter results by open hours optional field using this field, you can filter places in the results by the time a place is open for visitors note that Google may also provide results that do not match this filter possible values: \"open_now\", \"24_hours\", \"$day_value\", \"$day_value;$time_value\"; instead of $day_value use one of these values: \"monday\", \"tuesday\", \"wednesday\", \"thursday\", \"friday\", \"saturday\", \"sunday\"; instead of $time_value use one of these values: \"00\", \"01\", \"02\", \"03\", \"04\", \"05\", \"06\", \"07\", \"08\", \"09\", \"10\", \"11\", \"12\", \"13\", \"14\", \"15\", \"16\", \"17\", \"18\", \"19\", \"20\", \"21\", \"22\", \"23\" example: \"tuesday;18\""
  2. First observed

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare openWorldHint=true, destructiveHint=true, and readOnlyHint=false, covering the safety profile. The description adds genuinely useful behavioral context not in the annotations – real-time execution and default result caps of 20 (desktop) / 10 (mobile) – but says nothing about the absence of a device parameter that would make those caps selectable, nor about cost/auth implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with the purpose front-loaded and the result-limit detail second. It is efficient and wastes nothing, though the under-specification is a completeness problem rather than a conciseness virtue.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value detail is not required, and annotations carry the safety profile. But for a live SERP endpoint in a dense sibling cluster, the description omits usage routing, device-selection mechanics (the promised desktop/mobile caps have no corresponding parameter), and any mention of the nested body contract.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage for the top-level parameter is 0% – the required 'body' array carries no description of its own. The description adds no meaning about the body structure, the keyword field, or the location/language alternatives, so it does not compensate for the coverage gap even though the nested field descriptions are rich.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb (provides real-time search results) and resource (Google Local Finder SERP) scoped by keyword and location, so the core purpose is clear. However, it offers no differentiation from the many sibling SERP tools (e.g. google_maps_live, google_organic_live, google_news_live), leaving the agent unable to distinguish which SERP endpoint to pick from the name alone.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternative guidance. For a tool sitting alongside a dozen near-identical SERP and data-source siblings, the absence of any routing cue is a significant gap.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources