Skip to main content
Glama

Feminiq Rides: Amsterdam chauffeur (female driver)

List Feminiq Rides services and prices

list_services
Read-onlyIdempotent

Fixed-fare Schiphol transfers (route ids, per-car prices), private tours (tour ids, durations, per-car prices), vehicles with passenger and luggage limits, and booking rules. No side effects.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_services"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, non-destructive, and closed-world behavior. The description adds useful context about the specific data returned, such as route IDs, per-car prices, durations, luggage limits, and booking rules, though 'No side effects' largely restates the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one dense but efficient sentence plus a redundant safety note. It front-loads the returned categories, though starting with a noun phrase rather than an explicit verb slightly weakens scanability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple, parameterless, read-only catalog tool with rich annotations but no output schema, the description sufficiently explains what information is returned. Minor gaps remain around output format and whether all services are returned in a single call.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there are no parameter semantics to explain. The baseline score for a parameterless tool is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the catalog contents: Schiphol transfer routes, private tours, vehicles, and booking rules, with prices and IDs. It is readily distinguishable from the booking-oriented siblings, but it does not explicitly contrast itself with get_quote or request_booking.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the catalog nature of the tool and by the sibling set of booking/quote operations. However, the description never explicitly states when to use this tool versus get_quote or request_booking, nor does it provide exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources