Skip to main content
Glama

Get flashcard set

get_flashcard_set
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get one flashcard set the user owns, with all its cards (prompt and answer).

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "setId": "<setId>"
    },
    "name": "get_flashcard_set"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
setIdYesFlashcard set id

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior, and the description adds useful context: it is scoped to sets the user owns and returns the full card contents. It does not cover not-found/unauthorized behavior or size limits, so not a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The single sentence is front-loaded with the operation and scope, then includes the return content. There is no redundant or filler text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter reader with rich annotations and no output schema, the description gives the key scope and return shape. It is nearly complete, though it omits error/edge-case behavior and explicit sibling routing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is one required parameter and schema coverage is 100%, with 'setId' described as the flashcard set id. The description adds no additional parameter meaning, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the exact operation and resource ('Get one flashcard set'), adds ownership scope, and specifies that all cards with prompt/answer are included. The singular 'one set' distinguishes it from list_flashcard_sets and list_my_flashcards without ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It does not say when to choose this over list_flashcard_sets, export_flashcard_set, or get_due_cards. Usage is only inferable from the purpose statement, with no explicit alternatives or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources