Skip to main content
Glama

Das Landhaus Apartments Prägant

Get Offers

get_offers
Read-only

List all current seasonal offers and packages published on praegant.net.

Use when the guest asks about deals, packages or what is special in a season, independent of dates. When the guest already has dates, check_availability includes only the offers valid for that stay — no need to call both. Visual version: render_offers_card. Behaviour: read-only; offers as published on the website (synced hourly, expired ones removed). Returns text plus structuredContent.offers (title, valid_from, valid_to, price_text, summary, url).

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
languageNoAnswer language: 'de' (default) or 'en' — use the language of the conversation. Text and card are always in the same language.de

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
offersNotitle, valid_from, valid_to, price_text, summary, season, url, includes, image
languageNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / language / description
      Previous value: -"'de' (default) or 'en' — the language of the conversation"New value: +"Answer language: 'de' (default) or 'en' — use the language of the conversation. Text and card are always in the same language."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "description": "Result of get_offers / render_offers_card.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "language": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "offers": {
      +      "description": "title, valid_from, valid_to, price_text, summary, season, url, includes, image",
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": true,
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": [
      +        "array",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / language / description
      Added value: +"'de' (default) or 'en' — the language of the conversation"
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/openWorld/destructive, yet the description still adds real context beyond them: offers are 'as published on the website (synced hourly, expired ones removed)', which tells the agent about freshness and why an offer may be missing. It also discloses the return shape (text plus structuredContent.offers). Not a 5 only because it restates 'read-only' redundantly and says nothing about what happens when no offers are published.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with purpose, then usage, then routing, then behaviour, then returns — each line carries distinct information with no filler. Dense but every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers selection criteria, sibling routing, freshness semantics and returned fields, which is more than enough for a zero-required-param list tool. Minor gap: no indication of behaviour when nothing is currently published (empty list vs. error), which matters slightly more here than a normal read since the description itself mentions expiry pruning.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one optional parameter and its schema description already covers the 'de'/'en' default and the text/card language consistency at 100% coverage. The tool description itself adds no parameter guidance, so the baseline 3 applies rather than a higher score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb + resource ('List all current seasonal offers and packages') with the source named (praegant.net). It explicitly differentiates itself from two siblings by name, check_availability for date-scoped use and render_offers_card for the visual variant.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

States the triggering condition ('guest asks about deals, packages or what is special in a season, independent of dates') and the exclusion ('when the guest already has dates, check_availability... no need to call both'). The visual alternative render_offers_card is also named, so routing is fully determined.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources