Skip to main content
Glama

Find and rank cruises with today's prices

search_cruises
Read-only

Accepts the request in plain words (q) or as fields. Searches every sailing Fantasize tracks (23 cruise lines, ~30,000 sailings, priced every night) by region, dates, departure port, ports visited, line, length, cabin and budget. Returns up to 25 sailings with the price per person (taxes and port fees in), per night and for a cabin of two, every cabin grade's price, whether the fare is low, typical or high against that sailing's usual price, the ports of call, and book_url - a link the person opens to book that exact sailing. Default ranking is best_value (furthest below its usual price).

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qNoThe person's request in plain words, e.g. "alaska in july from seattle, balcony, under $3000 for two". Read by fixed rules; the answer says how it was understood and which words were not. Any other argument given overrides what q says.
lineNoCruise line, e.g. "Royal Caribbean", "NCL", "Princess", "Viking"
shipNoShip name or part of it
sortNobest_value
tierNoluxury includes ultra-luxury; ultra-luxury is the top of the market only: Regent, Silversea, Seabourn, Explora Journeys (all-suite, all-inclusive)
cabinNoCabin grade to price. Omit to quote balcony where sold, else the next grade.
limitNo
monthNoDeparture month, YYYY-MM
regionNoWhere the cruise goes: a region (caribbean, bahamas, alaska, mexico, mediterranean, northern-europe, european-rivers, asia, repositioning, more) or a named place it calls at (greek-islands, norwegian-fjords, canada-new-england, canary-islands, british-isles, baltic, iceland, adriatic, japan, hawaii, panama-canal, bermuda, galapagos, tahiti, arctic, antarctica, danube, rhine, douro), or any port, island, country or state we sail to ("Santorini", "Maui", "Greece", "Juneau"). cruise_options lists the regions and named places with counts.
calls_atNoA port the ship must visit, e.g. "Juneau", "Santorini", "Cozumel"
depart_toNoLatest departure date, YYYY-MM-DD
from_portNoDeparture port, e.g. "Seattle" or "Barcelona"; several comma-separated: "Miami,Fort Lauderdale"
nights_maxNo
nights_minNo
depart_fromNoEarliest departure date, YYYY-MM-DD
only_below_usualNoOnly fares measurably below their usual price
max_price_per_nightNoBudget per person per night, USD
max_price_per_personNoBudget per person for the whole cruise, USD

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / region / description
      Previous value: -"Where the cruise goes: a region (caribbean, bahamas, alaska, mexico, mediterranean, northern-europe, european-rivers, asia, repositioning, more) or a named place it calls at (greek-islands, norwegian-fjords, canada-new-england, canary-islands, british-isles, baltic, iceland, adriatic, japan, hawaii, panama-canal, bermuda, galapagos, tahiti, arctic, antarctica, danube, rhine, douro). cruise_options lists every value with its count."New value: +"Where the cruise goes: a region (caribbean, bahamas, alaska, mexico, mediterranean, northern-europe, european-rivers, asia, repositioning, more) or a named place it calls at (greek-islands, norwegian-fjords, canada-new-england, canary-islands, british-isles, baltic, iceland, adriatic, japan, hawaii, panama-canal, bermuda, galapagos, tahiti, arctic, antarctica, danube, rhine, douro), or any port, island, country or state we sail to (\"Santorini\", \"Maui\", \"Greece\", \"Juneau\"). cruise_options lists the regions and named places with counts."
  2. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / region / description
      Previous value: -"Where the cruise goes: caribbean, bahamas, alaska, mexico, mediterranean, northern-europe, european-rivers, asia, repositioning, hawaii, bermuda, panama-canal, south-america, antarctica, australia, ... (every region with sailings on sale)"New value: +"Where the cruise goes: a region (caribbean, bahamas, alaska, mexico, mediterranean, northern-europe, european-rivers, asia, repositioning, more) or a named place it calls at (greek-islands, norwegian-fjords, canada-new-england, canary-islands, british-isles, baltic, iceland, adriatic, japan, hawaii, panama-canal, bermuda, galapagos, tahiti, arctic, antarctica, danube, rhine, douro). cruise_options lists every value with its count."
    • addedInput schema / properties / tier / description
      Added value: +"luxury includes ultra-luxury; ultra-luxury is the top of the market only: Regent, Silversea, Seabourn, Explora Journeys (all-suite, all-inclusive)"
    • changedInput schema / properties / tier / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "contemporary",
      -  "premium",
      -  "luxury",
      -  "river"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "contemporary",
      +  "premium",
      +  "luxury",
      +  "ultra-luxury",
      +  "river"
      +]
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / region / description
      Previous value: -"Where the cruise goes: caribbean, bahamas, alaska, mexico, mediterranean, northern-europe, european-rivers, asia, repositioning, hawaii, bermuda, panama-canal, south-america, antarctica, australia, ... (cruise_options lists them all with counts)"New value: +"Where the cruise goes: caribbean, bahamas, alaska, mexico, mediterranean, northern-europe, european-rivers, asia, repositioning, hawaii, bermuda, panama-canal, south-america, antarctica, australia, ... (every region with sailings on sale)"
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / q
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The person's request in plain words, e.g. \"alaska in july from seattle, balcony, under $3000 for two\". Read by fixed rules; the answer says how it was understood and which words were not. Any other argument given overrides what q says.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  5. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only cover readOnly/openWorld, so the description carries the rest — and it does: data freshness ('priced every night'), result cap ('up to 25 sailings'), exact price semantics (taxes and port fees in, per person, per night, for a cabin of two), the low/typical/high-vs-usual signal, and the default best_value ranking. With no output schema, this return-value disclosure is exactly the missing behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the action and scope, then the return payload and default ranking; the dense pricing sentence is long but every clause describes a distinct output field that no output schema covers. Slightly overlong but no filler sentences.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For an 18-parameter, zero-required tool with no output schema, the description covers purpose, scope, input modes, default ranking, and return contents well. Gaps are minor: no mention of pagination beyond the 25 cap, no error/empty-result behavior, and no sibling routing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 78%, so the schema already documents most filters; the description's list of filterable dimensions largely restates them. It adds marginal value by noting the 'up to 25 sailings' cap (matching limit.maximum), though it doesn't mention the default limit of 10, so it neither compensates for nor extends the schema much.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Searches every sailing Fantasize tracks ... by region, dates, departure port, ports visited, line, length, cabin and budget') and quantifies scope (23 cruise lines, ~30,000 sailings). An agent can tell this apart from get_cruise (single sailing) or compare_cruise_lines without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explains the two input modes ('the request in plain words (q) or as fields') and the override precedence, which is useful call-time guidance. However it never names an alternative sibling or states when NOT to use this tool (e.g. use check_price for one fare, cruise_options for browsing regions), so routing is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources