Skip to main content
Glama

DigiAdapt AdTech Intel

Get the DigiAdapt Signal

get_market_signal
Read-only

The DigiAdapt Signal: a two-sentence read on what today's AdTech developments have in common.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_market_signal"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
signalYes
generatedAtYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds that the result is a 'two-sentence read,' setting expectations for output length and focus, but it does not discuss freshness, sourcing, or whether the signal is generated dynamically.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. The only minor redundancy is restating the title's name, but the sentence remains efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless, read-only summary tool with an output schema and safety annotations, the description covers what the signal is. However, it omits usage context and sibling differentiation, leaving an agent to infer when to call it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero input parameters and the schema is empty with 100% coverage. Per the baseline for parameterless tools, no additional parameter meaning is needed, and the description correctly avoids inventing inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies the resource and content: a two-sentence read on what today's AdTech developments have in common. It clearly conveys the type of output, but it does not explicitly differentiate this tool from siblings like get_adtech_intel or search_intel.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit when-to-use guidance, no conditions for choosing it over get_adtech_intel or search_intel, and no exclusions. The phrase 'today's AdTech developments' only loosely implies a use case.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources