Skip to main content
Glama

wendys_store

Read-only

Fetch one Wendy's store record with its full weekly and separate drive-through hours, services, and delivery links. Use wendys_directory or wendys_nearby to find a store, or wendys_restaurant for its restaurant page details.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "path": "<path>"
    },
    "name": "wendys_store"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathYesRequired. Store path from a /wendys/directory child with is_store true.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds payload context (hours, services, delivery links), which is useful, but says nothing about rate limits, auth, or handling of missing stores. With annotations carrying the behavior burden, a 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with purpose front-loaded and routing information second. The enumeration of return fields slightly overlaps with the available output schema, but nothing is wasteful or buried.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the description need not explain return values, and it correctly focuses on what the tool does and how to obtain the required path. An agent has everything needed to invoke it, though it could note lookup failure behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single path parameter is already documented in the schema as coming from a /wendys/directory child with is_store true. The description only indirectly reinforces this by pointing to wendys_directory/wendys_nearby, adding no syntax or format detail beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Fetch one Wendy's store record') and enumerates the payload scope (weekly and drive-through hours, services, delivery links), while naming the sibling tools it is not. An agent can distinguish it from wendys_directory, wendys_nearby, and wendys_restaurant without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent: use wendys_directory or wendys_nearby to obtain a store path, and wendys_restaurant for restaurant page details instead. Both the prerequisite flow and the alternative tool for a related need are stated, leaving little to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.