Skip to main content
Glama

wccftech_news

Read-only

Fetch current Wccftech stories from its public RSS feed and return titles, summaries, and canonical article URLs. Use this to browse current tech news.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "wccftech_news"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuine context beyond that by disclosing the data source (a public RSS feed, implying recency and limited coverage) and the shape of the payload (titles, summaries, canonical URLs). It stops short of noting freshness cadence or result limits, but it earns credit over the annotation baseline.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with zero waste. The resource and return shape are front-loaded, and the usage cue follows immediately, so an agent gets the essentials in the first clause.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless feed tool with an output schema (so return values need not be explained), the description is nearly sufficient, but it omits the one thing that matters most in this dense sibling cluster: how it differs from wccftech_headlines and wccftech_article. That routing gap keeps it at minimum-viable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes no parameters (schema coverage 100%, empty object), so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate. Baseline 4 applies; no parameter-level detail is expected or missing.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a concrete verb and resource ('Fetch current Wccftech stories from its public RSS feed') and even enumerates the returned fields (titles, summaries, canonical article URLs). It does not, however, distinguish itself from close siblings like wccftech_headlines or wccftech_article, which an agent could easily confuse it with.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Use this to browse current tech news' implies the use case but gives no explicit when-to-use/when-not or routing against wccftech_headlines (a headline list) or wccftech_article (a single story). The guidance is present but shallow.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.