Skip to main content
Glama

vinted_member

Read-only

A Vinted seller's public storefront profile: username, self-disclosed coarse location, rating, and follower/following counts.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "vinted_member"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesNumeric Vinted member ID, from a /vinted/item result's seller link

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / id / description
      Added value: +"Numeric Vinted member ID, from a /vinted/item result's seller link"
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful framing that the data is 'public' and the location 'self-disclosed', which signals privacy scope and data provenance. It does not add auth requirements, rate limits, or freshness behavior beyond that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single compact sentence that front-loads the resource identity and then lists the returned fields. Nothing is padded or redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With a complete parameter schema, an output schema, and read-only annotations, the description covers what an agent needs. The only residual gap is sourcing the ID, though that is already handled by the parameter description in the schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single 'id' parameter, and the schema itself explains it is a 'Numeric Vinted member ID, from a /vinted/item result's seller link'. The description says nothing about the parameter, so it adds no meaning beyond the schema — the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the specific resource ('a Vinted seller's public storefront profile') and enumerates the fields returned (username, location, rating, follower/following counts), which clearly distinguishes it from siblings like vinted_item or vinted_brand. It lacks an explicit verb ('retrieve'), but the noun phrase is specific enough that an agent knows exactly what this tool surfaces.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: the description states what the profile contains, so an agent can infer this is for looking up a specific member. There is no statement of when to prefer it over alternatives, no prerequisites, and no exclusions (e.g., that an ID must already be in hand).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.