Skip to main content
Glama

upwork_search

Read-only

Search Upwork public job postings and return normalized job-summary items. Use upwork_job with a returned job ID for the full posting details.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "q": "<q>"
    },
    "name": "upwork_search"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qYesFree-text job search keyword
pageNo1-based result page. Defaults to 1.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / page / description
      Added value: +"1-based result page. Defaults to 1."
    • addedInput schema / properties / q / description
      Added value: +"Free-text job search keyword"
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so safety is covered. The description adds useful scope (only PUBLIC postings) and characterizes the output as normalized summaries rather than raw payloads, which goes beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with zero filler. The core purpose leads, and the follow-up routing to upwork_job is packed into the second sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be detailed, and the description still notes the summary shape plus the path to full details. Coverage of pagination behavior and result limits is absent, a minor gap for a search tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with only two parameters, both documented in the schema (q as free-text keyword, page as 1-based). The description adds no syntax, format, or paging guidance beyond that, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb (search) plus resource (Upwork public job postings) and explicitly states the return shape (normalized job-summary items). It distinguishes itself from the sibling upwork_job, which returns full posting details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Clearly routes the agent: use upwork_job with a returned job ID when full posting details are needed. That is a concrete follow-up condition, though it does not state when this tool should be avoided or what other search alternatives exist.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.