Skip to main content
Glama

tomshardware_author

Read-only

Fetch a Tom's Hardware author's public profile, expertise, social links, and one page of recent articles. Use tomshardware_article for one story or tomshardware_news for current coverage.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "tomshardware_author"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlNoCanonical tomshardware.com/author/<slug> URL, optionally with a /page/<n> segment; alternative to slug
pageNo1-based page number; overrides any page number in url
slugNoAuthor slug, e.g. christian-eberle

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / page / description
      Added value: +"1-based page number; overrides any page number in url"
    • addedInput schema / properties / slug / description
      Added value: +"Author slug, e.g. christian-eberle"
    • addedInput schema / properties / url / description
      Added value: +"Canonical tomshardware.com/author/<slug> URL, optionally with a /page/<n> segment; alternative to slug"
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds a genuine behavioral constraint — it returns only 'one page of recent articles' — and lists the profile fields returned. It stops short of auth/rate-limit details, so a 4 rather than 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with zero waste, front-loading what the tool returns before routing the agent to the alternatives. Every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value explanation is unnecessary, and the description covers purpose and alternatives well. It is essentially complete; only minor behavioral detail (e.g., how many articles per page) is left implicit.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents url, page, and slug with the slug/page precedence rule. The description only implies pagination via 'one page of recent articles' and adds no syntax or format detail beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Fetch') and resource (Tom's Hardware author's public profile) and enumerates the returned content: expertise, social links, and recent articles. It explicitly names sibling tools, so an agent can distinguish it from tomshardware_article and tomshardware_news without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit routing: 'Use tomshardware_article for one story or tomshardware_news for current coverage.' This tells the agent the exact conditions under which the alternatives should be chosen over this tool, leaving nothing to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.