Skip to main content
Glama

tiktok_mobile_music_beats

Read-only

Return TikTok mobile's beats/songs chart as full sound objects. Use this when exploring the app's beats/songs surface; the measured response is one page without cursor or has_more fields, and count is not a verified page-size control.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "tiktok_mobile_music_beats"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
countNoAccepted for compatibility only; it is not a verified page-size control.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnlyHint/openWorldHint annotations, it discloses useful behavioral facts: the one-page response shape (no cursor or has_more) and that count is not a verified page-size control. This is real added value about response behavior that annotations do not cover.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the action and resource, then the caveats. No filler, though the second sentence is somewhat dense with two ideas stacked together.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present and the single parameter fully described, the description covers what an agent needs: what the tool returns, its scope, and the pagination limitation. Adequately complete for a simple chart tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single 'count' parameter is already documented as compatibility-only in the schema itself; the description merely repeats that. Baseline 3 is correct since the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Return) and resource (TikTok mobile's beats/songs chart as full sound objects), which is concrete enough to distinguish it from siblings like music_trending or music_collections. It does not explicitly name a sibling to differentiate itself, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Use this when exploring the app's beats/songs surface' gives implied context but no explicit when-not-to-use and no named alternative among the many tiktok_mobile_music_* siblings. The guidance is present but shallow.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.