Skip to main content
Glama

ticketmaster_trending_attractions

Read-only

Fetch ranked currently trending Ticketmaster attractions across all segments. Use ticketmaster_suggest for typeahead or ticketmaster_attraction to inspect one attraction.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "ticketmaster_trending_attractions"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that results are ranked and time-sensitive ('currently trending') and span all segments, but says nothing about result count, pagination, or geographic scope.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the scoping constraint, and the second sentence earns its place by routing to the two relevant siblings. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be described, annotations cover safety, and there are no parameters to document. Remaining minor gap is the absence of any hint about list size or refresh cadence for a 'trending' feed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, which puts the baseline at 4 per the rubric. There is nothing for the description to clarify about arguments beyond confirming the global, unfiltered nature of the call.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Fetch), resource (trending Ticketmaster attractions), and scope (ranked, currently trending, across all segments). An agent can distinguish it from ticketmaster_attraction or ticketmaster_suggest without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes to alternatives: ticketmaster_suggest for typeahead and ticketmaster_attraction to inspect a single attraction, implicitly framing this tool as the list/trending path. No explicit when-not or exclusion clause, but the context of use is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.