Skip to main content
Glama

therealreal_designers

Read-only

The RealReal's designer directory for one department: every designer it recognizes, not just designers with active listings.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "therealreal_designers"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
categoryNoDesigner-directory department. One of: women, men, fine-jewelry, watches, art, home, kids. Defaults to women.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, covering the safety profile. The description adds one genuinely useful behavioral fact: the directory includes designers without active listings. It does not address pagination, result size, or auth needs, so with annotations carrying the rest it lands at a solid 3.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single tight sentence that front-loads the resource and then the differentiating scope qualifier. Nothing extraneous.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value explanation is unnecessary, and annotations cover the safety profile. For a one-optional-param read-only directory tool this is nearly complete; only explicit routing to sibling tools would make it fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the category enum values are fully listed in the schema, so the schema does the heavy lifting. The description's phrase 'for one department' loosely maps to the category parameter but adds no new syntax or default information beyond what the schema already states.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (The RealReal's designer directory) scoped to one department, and distinguishes itself from a listing-driven view by noting it includes every recognized designer, not just those with active listings. This lets an agent separate it from therealreal_designer (singular) and therealreal_search without opening schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implicitly clear (browse the designer catalog for a department), but there is no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and no alternative named, even though therealreal_designer and therealreal_search are obvious adjacent choices.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.