Skip to main content
Glama

thebodyshop_store

Read-only

Fetch store details for The Body Shop's fixed public storefront, including normalized metadata. Use thebodyshop_collections for catalog groups, thebodyshop_page for one content page, or thebodyshop_sitemaps for sitemap discovery; no store URL is accepted.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "thebodyshop_store"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful context beyond them: the storefront is 'fixed' and 'public' (i.e., a single, non-parameterized target) and returns normalized metadata, which explains why no arguments exist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One tight sentence: the core action and scope come first, then the disambiguation list, then the input constraint. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema covers return values and annotations cover safety, so the description only needs to explain scope and routing, which it does. Minor room remains on what 'normalized metadata' entails, but the output schema absorbs that.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With zero parameters, the baseline is 4, and the description reinforces this by stating 'no store URL is accepted', pre-empting an agent's likely attempt to pass a store identifier.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Fetch) and resource (store details for the fixed public storefront), plus the scope qualifier 'fixed public' and 'normalized metadata'. It also names the sibling tools it is not (thebodyshop_collections, thebodyshop_page, thebodyshop_sitemaps), so an agent can distinguish it without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent to three alternatives for their respective jobs and adds a hard constraint ('no store URL is accepted'). It stops just short of stating the positive trigger condition for using this tool itself, but the alternatives plus the no-argument constraint make the intended use clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.