Skip to main content
Glama

thebodyshop_product

Read-only

Fetch one The Body Shop product's normalized detail by its handle on the fixed storefront. Use thebodyshop_products to browse product records or thebodyshop_search_suggest to find a product handle.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "handle": "<handle>"
    },
    "name": "thebodyshop_product"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
handleYesRequired. Product handle (URL slug).

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the useful scoping detail that this is a fixed, single-storefront lookup and returns normalized (not raw) detail, but says nothing about error behavior for an unknown handle or rate limits. With annotations carrying the safety burden, a 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero padding. The core action is front-loaded and the sibling routing follows immediately, with every clause earning its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A one-parameter read tool with an output schema, full schema coverage, and annotations covering safety. The description supplies the scoping and routing context that structured fields cannot, so nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single handle parameter is already documented as a required URL slug. The phrase 'by its handle' only echoes the schema, adding no format or validation guidance beyond it, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Fetch), a single resource (one The Body Shop product's normalized detail), and the exact lookup key (handle) on a fixed storefront. An agent can immediately distinguish it from thebodyshop_products (browse) and thebodyshop_search_suggest (handle discovery).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent: use thebodyshop_products to browse records, or thebodyshop_search_suggest to obtain a handle. Both prerequisites and the alternative tools are named, leaving nothing to infer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.