Skip to main content
Glama

theage_article

Read-only

One Age article's metadata and served body paragraphs, with paywall flags: is_accessible_for_free, paywalled, is_truncated.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "url": "<url>"
    },
    "name": "theage_article"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYesCanonical The Age article URL

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / url / description
      Added value: +"Canonical The Age article URL"
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the safety profile (readOnlyHint, openWorldHint), and the description adds genuinely useful behavioral context by disclosing paywall semantics via is_accessible_for_free, paywalled, and is_truncated — telling an agent the body may be partial. It stops short of saying what content is actually returned when paywalled.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single compact sentence, front-loaded with the resource, that enumerates the return payload. No filler; every clause carries information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be explained, and this is a simple single-URL lookup. The description is adequate, with the only real gap being paywall-affected behavior and how to source a valid URL.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With one parameter at 100% schema description coverage, the schema already documents 'url' as the canonical The Age article URL. The description adds nothing further about the parameter, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource ('One Age article') and specifies what is returned: metadata, served body paragraphs, and named paywall flags. It's clearly distinguishable from the many sibling '*_article' fetchers by naming The Age, though it doesn't explicitly contrast with theage_headlines/theage_news/theage_sections.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance, no indication that a canonical URL is typically obtained from theage_headlines/theage_sections first, and no mention of when to prefer this over the sister section/headline tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.