Skip to main content
Glama

substack_note

Read-only

Get one public Substack Note -- the platform's short-form social post -- with its author, engagement counts, and the post it links to when it has one. note_id is the numeric id from a Note URL: in /@handle/note/c-316240438 it is 316240438.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "note_id": "<note_id>"
    },
    "name": "substack_note"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
note_idYesRequired numeric Note id. In a Note URL like /@handle/note/c-316240438 this is the digits after the c- prefix.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety and reach profile is covered. The description adds that only public notes are returned and enumerates the payload shape, but does not discuss what happens on missing/private ids.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero waste, with the resource definition front-loaded and the id format explained immediately after. Every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter getter with an output schema and read-only/open-world annotations, nothing material is missing: purpose, input format, and returned content are all covered.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the schema already explains the c- prefix parsing, so the description's URL example largely repeats structured data. Baseline 3 applies when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Get one public Substack Note') and defines what a Note is plus the payload (author, engagement counts, linked post). It does not explicitly name the plural sibling substack_notes or the reply/restack tools, leaving the boundary to be inferred.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied rather than stated: the URL-to-note_id mapping signals you need an existing Note id, but there is no when-to-use guidance and no mention of alternatives like substack_notes (list) or substack_note_replies.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.