Skip to main content
Glama

stevemadden_page

Read-only

Returns normalized static page detail for one Steve Madden (https://www.stevemadden.com) page handle. The storefront URL is fixed server-side. Use stevemadden_pages to list Steve Madden static pages.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "handle": "<handle>"
    },
    "name": "stevemadden_page"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
handleYesRequired. Static page handle (URL slug).

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safe-read profile is covered. The description adds genuine context beyond that: output is 'normalized' and 'the storefront URL is fixed server-side', telling the agent no URL parameter is needed. It doesn't cover behavior for an unknown handle (error vs empty), so a 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, zero waste, with the core purpose front-loaded and the sibling pointer trailing. Nothing redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need no explanation, and the description covers scope, the fixed server-side URL, and the listing alternative. Only minor gap is behavior on a missing/invalid handle, which keeps it from a 5.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single handle parameter is fully documented in the schema as a URL slug. The description restates it as a 'page handle' but adds no syntax, format, or example beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Returns normalized static page detail') scoped to a single Steve Madden page handle, and explicitly distinguishes itself from stevemadden_pages which lists pages. An agent can tell the two apart immediately.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly names the sibling tool stevemadden_pages and the condition that selects it ('to list ... static pages'), implying this tool is for retrieving one page's detail. No explicit when-not-to-use or error/precondition guidance, so not a full 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.