Crawlora MCP

motogp_entries

Read-only

Read one MotoGP event category's complete published entry list and return the whole native entry array plus an optional report link. Each entry preserves published full name, country fields, number, team/constructor data and native wildcard/replacement/replaced/rookieOfTheYear/independentTeamRider flags; source order, string/number representations, nulls, zeroes and false values are preserved. event_uuid and category_uuid are native result UUIDs (get complete tuples from motogp_entry_grid_options; content-event IDs are a different namespace), and the event's category membership is checked before reading. This never reconciles entries with grids or infers active riders, and report URLs are metadata only — files are not downloaded.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "event_uuid": "<event_uuid>",
      "category_uuid": "<category_uuid>"
    },
    "name": "motogp_entries"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`event_uuid`	Yes	Required native result-event UUID from result-event discovery or from motogp_entry_grid_options' entries tuples. This is not a content-event UUID.
`category_uuid`	Yes	Required native result-category UUID from that event's result-category discovery or from motogp_entry_grid_options' entries tuples. The event's category membership is checked before the entry list is read, so an unrelated category is rejected.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`data`	Yes	The tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

AddedNov 11, 2026

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only cover readOnlyHint and openWorldHint; the description adds substantial behavior: category membership is validated before reading (so bad categories are rejected), field values including nulls, zeroes and false are preserved verbatim, source ordering is retained, and report URLs are metadata only with no file download. It also explicitly bounds scope by saying it does not infer active riders — disclosure well beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose and return shape are front-loaded, and the caveats (namespace, membership check, no grid reconciliation, no downloads) follow in a logical order with no filler. It is dense — the UUID namespace warning appears in both the description body and the parenthetical — so a small amount of redundancy keeps it below 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite a rich output schema, the description explains the return shape (native entry array plus optional report link), the field-preservation contract, and the pre-read validation, which is everything an agent needs to call it correctly and interpret the result. No prerequisites or failure modes relevant to invocation are left unstated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so a baseline of 3 applies, but the description adds value the schema does not: it names where to obtain complete UUID tuples (motogp_entry_grid_options) and restates the namespace hazard between result-event and content-event UUIDs. It repeats some schema wording about the category membership check, which keeps it from a 5.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Read one MotoGP event category's complete published entry list', and explicitly delimits the output ('whole native entry array plus an optional report link'). It also distinguishes itself from adjacent siblings by declaring that it 'never reconciles entries with grids', which separates it from grid/classification tools without needing the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete provenance guidance for both required parameters ('get complete tuples from motogp_entry_grid_options') and warns that content-event IDs are a different namespace, which is exactly the mistake an agent would otherwise make. It falls short of a 5 because it never states a positive when-to-use-vs-alternative rule (e.g. pick this over motogp_starting_grid when you want the published entry list rather than results).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Crawlora MCP tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.