Skip to main content
Glama

modrinth_projects

Read-only

Get multiple Modrinth projects in one native batch read from a JSON-encoded array of project ids or slugs, returning the matching project metadata rows in the site's own order. Absent members are omitted and an empty array is a valid empty result; get ids from modrinth_search. Use this instead of repeated modrinth_project calls when resolving several projects at once.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "ids": "<ids>"
    },
    "name": "modrinth_projects"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idsYesRequired JSON-encoded array of Modrinth project ids or slugs. Absent members are omitted from the response; an empty array is valid.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds non-obvious behavior: the argument is a JSON-encoded string rather than a real array, absent members are silently omitted, an empty array is a legal empty result, and output order follows the site. It doesn't mention auth or rate-limit behavior, which keeps it short of a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two dense sentences with no filler, ordering the key facts front to back: what it does, what it returns, edge-case semantics, then the sibling comparison. Nothing could be cut without losing information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter batch read with annotations and an output schema, the description covers the input quirk, omission semantics, ordering and the alternative tool. Return-value structure is left to the output schema, which is appropriate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single parameter's schema description already covers JSON-encoding, omitted members and empty-array validity. The description restates those points, adding little beyond the schema, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource (get multiple Modrinth projects), plus the batch scope and return shape ('matching project metadata rows'). It explicitly contrasts itself with modrinth_project, so an agent can pick it without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent: 'Use this instead of repeated modrinth_project calls when resolving several projects at once', and tells where ids come from ('get ids from modrinth_search'). Both the positive case and the swap-in alternative are named.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.