Skip to main content
Glama

modrinth_metadata_link_platforms

Read-only

List Modrinth's native link-platform names and their donation classification as reference data. Use it when you need to interpret a project's external links or donation targets; it takes no input and never starts a payment, donation or account action.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "modrinth_metadata_link_platforms"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, but the description adds real value by pre-empting the misreading that 'donation' implies a transaction: 'never starts a payment, donation or account action.' Combined with 'takes no input,' the agent knows invocation is side-effect free and safe to repeat.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero filler. The resource and its reference-data framing come first, followed by the usage condition and safety caveat, which is the right priority order for an agent scanning definitions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the description need not enumerate return values, and it correctly stays at the level of purpose, triggering context, and safety profile. Nothing an agent needs to call this correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so the baseline of 4 applies; the description reinforces this with 'it takes no input,' which prevents an agent from hunting for filter arguments. Nothing further could be added about parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'List Modrinth's native link-platform names and their donation classification.' It also frames the artifact as reference data, which immediately separates this static enumeration from project-fetching siblings like modrinth_project or modrinth_check_project.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Use it when you need to interpret a project's external links or donation targets' gives a concrete triggering condition rather than vague encouragement. It does not name an alternative sibling to prefer in other cases, but as a no-input reference lookup with no near-equivalent sibling, the guidance is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.