Skip to main content
Glama

faceit_rule

Read-only

Get FACEIT competition rule detail. Returns one published rule set: rule id, name, game, organizer id, creation and update timestamps and the full rule body in markdown. Rule ids come from faceit-rules. An unknown id answers 404.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "faceit_rule"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesRequired rule UUID from faceit-rules.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Despite readOnlyHint and openWorldHint annotations, the description adds useful behavior: it returns one published rule set, lists returned fields, and specifies that an unknown id returns 404. This is strong for a simple read tool, though it does not discuss authorization or other error modes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded, concise, and has no wasted wording. It covers purpose, return content, id sourcing, and error behavior in three sentences.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the single required parameter, output schema, and read-only annotations, the description is complete enough to invoke correctly. It covers what the tool returns, where ids come from, and what happens for an unknown id.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents the id as a required rule UUID from faceit_rules. The description reinforces the source and adds 404 behavior for unknown ids, but does not add syntax or format meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: get FACEIT competition rule detail. It also clarifies scope by saying it returns one published rule set, which distinguishes it from the sibling list tool faceit_rules.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It tells the agent that rule ids come from faceit_rules, which is clear routing guidance for obtaining the required id. It does not explicitly say when not to use this tool or name faceit_rules as the browsing alternative, so it falls short of full when-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.