Skip to main content
Glama

faceit_player

Read-only

Get FACEIT player profile by nickname or user id. Returns one FACEIT profile: nickname, avatar and cover image, country, verified/registration status, memberships and per-game competitive state (Elo, region, skill level and level label). Exactly one of nickname and user_id is required. The ranking routes accept the user id returned here. A nickname that does not exist is an unknown entity and answers 404; profile friends, streaming ids and linked platform accounts are deliberately not mirrored.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "faceit_player"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
user_idNoOptional FACEIT user UUID; exactly one of nickname and user_id is required.
nicknameNoOptional FACEIT nickname; exactly one of nickname and user_id is required.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish read-only and open-world behavior, so the bar is lower, but the description still adds real context: a nonexistent nickname yields a 404, and friends, streaming ids, and linked platform accounts are deliberately excluded. Those are meaningful behavioral boundaries an agent would otherwise have to discover.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is dense but front-loaded, leading with purpose before constraints and edge cases. The enumeration of returned fields is somewhat long, but each sentence carries relevant selection or invocation information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the return-value enumeration is partly redundant, but the description still covers the two input modes, the 404 edge case, and the deliberate omissions. An agent can call this correctly without consulting anything else.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both parameter descriptions already state the exactly-one-of rule, so the description adds little new parameter meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource ("Get FACEIT player profile") and immediately scopes it to lookup by nickname or user id. It distinguishes itself from the ranking siblings by noting that "The ranking routes accept the user id returned here," making its role as the identity-resolution entry point explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It states the selection rule between the two input modes ("Exactly one of nickname and user_id is required") and points to how other routes consume its output. There is no explicit when-not-to-use clause, but the routing hint to ranking tools gives clear context for where this tool fits.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.