Skip to main content
Glama

Crawlora MCP

yahoo_shopping_sitemaps

Read-only

List Yahoo Shopping's public sitemap section and campaign archive links so you can find an archive URL. Use this tool to discover links to pass into yahoo_shopping_sitemap.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "yahoo_shopping_sitemaps"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful context that this lists public sitemap and campaign archive links for discovery. It does not describe pagination or rate-limit behavior, but the output schema and annotations cover much of the remaining burden.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences and front-loads the core action and resource. Every sentence contributes: the first identifies what is listed, and the second explains the discovery workflow toward yahoo_shopping_sitemap.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With zero parameters, readOnly/openWorld annotations, and an existing output schema, the description provides enough context for an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly. The key workflow detail, using the returned links with yahoo_shopping_sitemap, is stated explicitly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so there is no parameter semantics to explain. The baseline for a no-parameter tool is 4, and the description does not introduce any confusing parameter-like language.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb, "List," and names the exact resource: Yahoo Shopping's public sitemap section and campaign archive links. It also distinguishes this discovery tool from the sibling yahoo_shopping_sitemap by saying the links are meant to be passed into that tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly states when to use the tool: to discover links that can be passed into yahoo_shopping_sitemap, and to find an archive URL. The downstream relationship to the sibling tool is clear enough that an agent does not need to infer the workflow.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources