Skip to main content
Glama

Crawlora MCP

yahoo_finance_ticker_options_expiration

Read-only

Fetch Yahoo Finance options-chain results for one symbol and Unix expiration timestamp. Use yahoo_finance_ticker_options to discover available expirations and chains.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "symbol": "<symbol>"
    },
    "name": "yahoo_finance_ticker_options_expiration"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
symbolYesYahoo Finance symbol such as AAPL.
expirationNoUnix expiration timestamp.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds little behavior beyond the operation itself; it does not explain optional-expiration behavior, return characteristics, or external data limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the core operation and followed by the routing instruction. No filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and the alternative discovery tool is named, so return-value detail is unnecessary. The main gap is that expiration is optional in the schema but the description does not clarify what happens when it is omitted.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the symbol and expiration parameters are already documented in the schema. The description restates 'one symbol and Unix expiration timestamp' without adding format, validation, or optionality semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Fetch' with the resource 'Yahoo Finance options-chain results' and scopes it to one symbol and Unix expiration timestamp. It also names the sibling tool for discovery, so it is distinguishable from yahoo_finance_ticker_options.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly directs the agent to yahoo_finance_ticker_options to discover available expirations and chains, establishing the alternative for the discovery step. The intended call context is clear: fetch a chain once symbol and expiration are known.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources