Skip to main content
Glama

Crawlora MCP

wolt_collections

Read-only

Fetch Wolt's curated restaurant/store collections for a location and indicate whether the location is serviceable. Use wolt_search for restaurant results, wolt_cities to discover cities, or wolt_restaurant for one listing's details.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "latitude": "<latitude>",
      "longitude": "<longitude>"
    },
    "name": "wolt_collections"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
latitudeYesSearch center latitude (required).
longitudeYesSearch center longitude (required).

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds one useful behavioral element, the serviceability indicator, but says nothing about pagination, auth, or what a collection contains beyond the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, the core action front-loaded and routing instructions trailing. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need not be explained, and annotations cover the safety profile. The description covers purpose, the serviceability signal, and sibling routing, leaving only minor gaps such as result limits or region coverage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both latitude and longitude are fully documented in the schema (100% coverage), so the schema does the heavy lifting. The description adds no coordinate format or radius semantics beyond what the schema provides, making the baseline 3 appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb (Fetch) + resource (curated restaurant/store collections) + scope (for a location), and it explicitly names sibling tools it is not. An agent can distinguish this from wolt_search and wolt_restaurant without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It routes the agent to alternatives (wolt_search for restaurant results, wolt_cities for cities, wolt_restaurant for one listing) with the condition attached to each. There is no explicit statement of when the collections tool itself is preferred over those, but the implied use case is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources