Skip to main content
Glama

Crawlora MCP

timesofindia_news

Read-only

Fetch The Times of India top stories from the public feed; returns headline items from the general top-story stream. For a section-specific list, use timesofindia_headlines with a supported section slug. Use timesofindia_sections to discover section slugs. Use timesofindia_article with a returned article URL when you need one story's body.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "timesofindia_news"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so safety profile is known. The description adds useful context that this is a general top-story stream from a public feed (not section-filtered), which helps an agent understand what it will get. It doesn't mention rate limits, pagination, or freshness, so it's not a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tightly packed sentences, front-loaded with what the tool returns, followed by routing to siblings. Every sentence earns its place, no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Has an output schema (so return shape needn't be explained), zero params, and annotations covering safety and open-world nature. The description adds the key remaining info: which stream it pulls and how it relates to all three siblings. Complete and correct.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description appropriately doesn't invent params and instead explains the scoping (general stream vs section slug via sibling), which is the relevant semantic context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Fetch) and resource (The Times of India top stories) with clear scope (general top-story stream, public feed). This clearly distinguishes it from timesofindia_headlines (section-specific), timesofindia_sections (slug discovery), and timesofindia_article (single story body).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use alternatives: timesofindia_headlines for section-specific lists, timesofindia_sections to discover slugs, and timesofindia_article with a returned URL for one story's body. This is exactly the routing guidance an agent needs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources