Skip to main content
Glama

Crawlora MCP

tiktok_top_ads_detail

Read-only

Returns detail for one TikTok Creative Center Top Ads material. Use material_id; the upstream does not accept id or materialId. Use tiktok_top_ads_list to retrieve TikTok Top Ads.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "material_id": "<material_id>"
    },
    "name": "tiktok_top_ads_detail"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
material_idYesRequired. Top Ads material id.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds only that the upstream rejects id/materialId, which is useful but largely a parameter constraint rather than broader behavioral context such as auth, rate limits, or return shape.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with what the tool returns and followed by the parameter constraint and sibling alternative. Every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter detail tool with an output schema and read-only annotations, the description covers purpose, required parameter, naming pitfall, and the correct list alternative. Nothing essential is missing for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so material_id is already documented, making 3 the baseline. The description adds meaningful value by warning that id and materialId are not accepted upstream, reducing common invocation errors.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: returns detail for one TikTok Creative Center Top Ads material. It also names tiktok_top_ads_list, so an agent can distinguish it from the list sibling without checking schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent to pass material_id and to use tiktok_top_ads_list for retrieving TikTok Top Ads. This names both the correct parameter and the relevant alternative, leaving little ambiguity about when to call this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources