Skip to main content
Glama

Crawlora MCP

ticketmaster_attraction_events

Read-only

List upcoming Ticketmaster events for a known attraction ID. Use ticketmaster_search_events to discover attractions or ticketmaster_attraction_related for related performers; ticketmaster_venue_events covers a venue ID.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "ticketmaster_attraction_events"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesRequired. Numeric Ticketmaster attraction id.
pageNoOptional. Zero-based result page. Defaults to 0.
sortNoOptional. One of relevance, date. Defaults to date.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description usefully adds the temporal scope ('upcoming') and the ID prerequisite, but says nothing about pagination or result-volume behavior beyond what the schema already exposes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero waste. The core action and scope are front-loaded, and the routing alternatives follow compactly in the second sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and annotations carry the safety profile. Purpose, prerequisite and sibling routing are all present, leaving nothing an agent needs to call it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so id, page and sort are fully documented in the schema itself. The description adds no format or syntax detail beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (List), resource (events) and scope (upcoming, for an attraction ID). It is immediately distinguishable from ticketmaster_venue_events and ticketmaster_event without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent: use ticketmaster_search_events to discover attractions, ticketmaster_attraction_related for related performers, and ticketmaster_venue_events for a venue ID. The 'known attraction ID' prerequisite tells the agent what state must hold before calling.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources