Crawlora MCP

thebodyshop_sitemap_urls

Read-only

Fetch sitemap URL records from a The Body Shop child sitemap matching its type. Use thebodyshop_sitemaps to discover the sitemap index and child sitemap URLs.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "thebodyshop_sitemap_urls"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`type`	No	Sitemap section to return. Allowed values: all, products, collections, pages, blogs, agentic_discovery, other. Defaults to all.
`limit`	No	Maximum URL entries to return. Default 50, maximum 250.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`data`	Yes	The tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedOct 5, 2026

TDQS

A4/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that records are matched by sitemap type, but says nothing about pagination, return volume, or what happens when a type has no child sitemap. With annotations carrying the safety burden, this is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with the core action and resource front-loaded, followed by the dependency hint. No filler and nothing restated from the title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and annotations cover the read-only/open-world profile. The description covers purpose and the sibling dependency, leaving only minor gaps around pagination behavior across a potentially large sitemap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents both parameters, including the allowed type values and the limit default/maximum. The description adds no syntax or format detail beyond what the schema provides, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Fetch') and resource ('sitemap URL records from a The Body Shop child sitemap') with the scoping qualifier 'matching its type'. It also names the sibling thebodyshop_sitemaps, letting an agent distinguish the two without opening schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent: use thebodyshop_sitemaps to discover the index and child sitemap URLs, implying this tool is the follow-up step once a child sitemap is known. There is no explicit 'when not to use' or prerequisite on how the type value is obtained, but the sequencing guidance is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Crawlora MCP tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?