Skip to main content
Glama

Crawlora MCP

techradar_article

Read-only

One public TechRadar article's metadata and body paragraphs.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "url": "<url>"
    },
    "name": "techradar_article"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYesCanonical TechRadar article URL

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / url / description
      Added value: +"Canonical TechRadar article URL"
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, and an output schema exists to document the return shape. The description contributes the useful detail that the article is 'public' (no auth needed) and returns body paragraphs, but there is no discussion of rate limits, truncation, or missing-content behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler. It states scope and contents without repeating the title or restating the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter fetcher with an output schema and safety annotations, the description covers what an agent needs to call it. Only minor gaps remain, such as whether non-article URLs fail or are resolved.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the single 'url' parameter is already documented as the canonical TechRadar URL. The description adds nothing about URL format, whether non-canonical links are normalized, or what happens on invalid input, so the schema carries the burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the resource (a single TechRadar article) and its contents (metadata plus body paragraphs), which is clear enough to distinguish it from the plural list-style siblings like techradar_headlines and techradar_news. It lacks an explicit verb, but 'One public ... article' conveys retrieval of a single item unambiguously.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: fetch this when you have a specific article URL. No alternative tools are named and there are no when-not conditions (e.g., what to use to discover articles first). For a fetch-by-URL tool this is workable but leaves routing to the agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources