Skip to main content
Glama

Crawlora MCP

sun_author

Read-only

Fetch one Sun author's public profile: name, job title, bio, and their recent articles. Use sun_article for one story's content. Use sun_headlines and sun_news for current outlet feeds. Use sun_sections to browse topics.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "url": "<url>"
    },
    "name": "sun_author"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYesCanonical The Sun author URL

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / url / description
      Added value: +"Canonical The Sun author URL"
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safe-read/open-web profile is covered. The description adds the useful fact that the response includes a bio and recent articles, but no rate limits, pagination, or error behavior beyond that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences, front-loaded with what the tool returns, followed by routing guidance. No filler text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With annotations covering the safety profile, a 100%-documented parameter, and an output schema handling return values, the description supplies everything an agent needs to distinguish and invoke this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single url parameter ('Canonical The Sun author URL'), so the schema already carries the detail. The description adds no syntax or format nuances beyond what is documented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Fetch) plus resource (one Sun author's public profile) and enumerates the returned fields: name, job title, bio, and recent articles. This clearly separates it from sibling content tools like sun_article.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent: use sun_article for one story's content, sun_headlines and sun_news for outlet feeds, and sun_sections to browse topics. When-to-use-this vs. alternatives is fully specified.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources