Skip to main content
Glama

Crawlora MCP

substack_note_restacks

Read-only

List the Notes that restacked a given Substack Note, each in the same shape as substack_note. A restack may carry its own commentary or be a bare reshare with an empty body. Cursor-paginated.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "note_id": "<note_id>"
    },
    "name": "substack_note_restacks"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cursorNoOpaque cursor from a previous response's next_cursor.
note_idYesRequired numeric Note id.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover the read-only and open-world profile, but the description adds real behavioral context: return objects match substack_note's shape, restacks may be bare reshares with empty bodies, and results are cursor-paginated. The empty-body caveat is exactly the kind of edge case an agent needs to parse output correctly.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences, front-loaded with the core action, followed by the data-shape caveat and pagination note. No redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need not be re-explained; annotations carry the safety profile; schema documents both params. The description supplies the remaining behavioral nuance (shape parity, empty-body restsacks, pagination), leaving nothing an agent needs missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both note_id and cursor. The description only reiterates cursor-pagination without adding format, limits, or cursor-usage detail, so the baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a concrete verb (List) and a precise resource (Notes that restacked a given Note), which an agent can distinguish from the sibling substack_note_replies. Scope is unambiguous: restacks of one note, not replies or the note itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The purpose implies when to reach for it (listing restacks of a note), but there is no explicit routing guidance versus alternatives like substack_note_replies or substack_notes, and no stated preconditions for obtaining a valid note_id. Usage is implied rather than stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources